Home | About us | Site Map | Contact Us


Home  |   Editorial  |   Insurace Policies  |   Article  |   News  |   Know your Insurer  |  Legal Page |   We The Agent  |  Press Media  |  Advertisement Showcase
Download Subscription Form  |  Download Newspaper |  Download Tarrif Card  |  Latest News  |  Word Jumble  | Consumers Connect |  Forum  | Sudoko | Jokes
Larger SC bench to examine cheque bounce cases’ conflict
While some judgements had stated that the 15 days period could be waived off, several other rulings had said that the time period was mandatory and no cognisance could be taken before its expiry


The Supreme Court has referred to a larger bench the question whether a person can be tried for a cheque bounce, even before the expiry of the 15 days notice period issued by a complainant. A bench of Justices TS Thakur and Gyan Sudha Misra framed two questions for consideration by a larger bench following conflicting judgements by the Supreme Court and a larger number of high courts in the country. Firstly, can cognisance of an offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, be taken on the basis of a complaint filed before the expiry of the period of 15 days stipulated in the notice required to be served upon the drawer of the cheque in terms of Section 138 (c) of the Act aforementioned? And secondly if answer to the first question is in the negative, can the complainant be permitted to present the complaint again notwithstanding the fact that the period of one month stipulated under Section 142 (b) for the filing of such a complaint has expired?

While some judgements had stated that the 15 days period could be waived off, several other rulings had said that the time period was mandatory and no cognisance could be taken before it expiry. The apex court passed the direction while dealing with an appeal filed by Yogendra Pratap Singh challenging an Allahabad High Court judgement quashing the cognisance taken by a magistrate of the complaint lodged by him against Savitri Pandey. Singh had filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against respondent Savitri Pandey in the court of additional civil judge, magistrate, Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh after four cheques allegedly issued by the woman bounced. As required under Section 138 (c), Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, he served her with a notice calling upon her to pay the amount.


Home | Editorial | Insurace Policies | Article | Know your Insurer | Legal PageWe The Agent | Download Subscribe Form | Download News Paper
Download Tarrif Card | Latest NewsWord Jumble | Disclaimer |  Contact Us

© Ritu Nanda Insurance Service Pvt. Ltd., All Right Reserved. Designed & Maintained by RNIS

hit counter